# Conditional Filters in QS Based on Filter Selection **URL:** \ **Category:** Q&A\ **Tags:** analysis, feature-request, Business-Intelligence-Engineer, quick-sight\ **Created:** [February 10, 2025, 10:07am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378 "2025-02-10T10:07:19Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ANIL2025](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85f322/32.png) [@ANIL2025](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ANIL2025)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 10:07am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378/1 "2025-02-10T10:07:19Z")
Hello everyone, I’m new to QS and I’m not sure if it’s possible to implement this feature. I have a dataset (as shown in the snapshot) and I have filter controls for Client ID, F1, F2, and F3. In my dataset, the values 1 and 0 indicate True and False, respectively. ![image](https://d1wl4jav5dp96l.cloudfront.net/original/3X/9/9/9909c8d3aba8153e34327f5b6ab47b8cc2167842.png) Is there a way to configure the filters so that, based on the Client ID selection, only those filters with a value of 1 in the dataset are shown? \*Example: - If the user selects Client ID “A”, then filters F1, F2, and F3 will be shown. - If Client ID “D” is selected, then only filter F1 will be shown, and F2 & F3 will be hidden. In the dataset, I have shown only 3 Client IDs for reference, but in the actual dataset, there are more than 200 Client IDs. Please advise if there is any solution for this. I can’t use the dynamic default parameter as it only works with username or group name. Thank you! ---
**Author:** ![ErikG](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/erikg/32/14524_2.png) [@ErikG](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ErikG)\ **Post date:** [February 10, 2025, 2:06pm UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378/3 "2025-02-10T14:06:38Z")
Hi @ANIL2025 as the combinations of F1, F2 and F3 are limited you could try to build a “contain” rule for all 200 ids. I guess there is no other option as you cant use calculated fields for a rule. BR ---
**Author:** ![Brett](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/brett/32/36494_2.png) [@Brett](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Brett)\ **Post date:** [February 24, 2025, 6:54pm UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378/4 "2025-02-24T18:54:04Z")
Hi @ANIL2025, It’s been awhile since we last heard from you on this thread, were you able to find a work around for your case or did you have any additional questions? If we do not hear back within the next 3 business days, I’ll close out this topic. Thank you! ---
**Author:** ![ANIL2025](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85f322/32.png) [@ANIL2025](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ANIL2025)\ **Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 3:09am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378/5 "2025-02-27T03:09:19Z")
Thank you, EricG I appreciate your help. Yes, there is no other option since we can’t use calculated fields for a rule. ---
**Author:** ![Brett](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/brett/32/36494_2.png) [@Brett](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Brett)\ **Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 5:06pm UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378/6 "2025-02-27T17:06:47Z")
Hi @ANIL2025, I’ll mark this as a feature request to promote visibility to the support team. Thank you! ---
**Author:** ![Brett](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/brett/32/36494_2.png) [@Brett](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Brett)\ **Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 5:06pm UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/conditional-filters-in-qs-based-on-filter-selection/42378/7 "2025-02-27T17:06:55Z")