# Dashboard opens with data but filters show error "Request took too long. try again later"

**URL:** <https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131>\
**Category:** Q&A\
**Tags:** error, developer, quick-sight\
**Created:** [October 18, 2023, 9:00am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131 "2023-10-18T09:00:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ali\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Ali\_B](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Ali_B)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:00am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/1 "2023-10-18T09:00:38Z")

</div>

This error happens when I open the dashboard. it works fine from the analysis.

Dashboard:

 ![image](https://d1wl4jav5dp96l.cloudfront.net/original/2X/d/da0aefd3280e7ba788fe07f99093dc883d835017.png)

Analysis:

 ![image](https://d1wl4jav5dp96l.cloudfront.net/original/2X/c/c1bc5d2037909f059fbeeabcde491c56334bfbfa.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ErikG](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/erikg/32/14524_2.png) [@ErikG](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ErikG)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:18am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/2 "2023-10-18T09:18:50Z")

</div>

Hi @Ali_B ,  
what is the exclamation mark telling?  
BG

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ali\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Ali\_B](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Ali_B)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:24am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/3 "2023-10-18T09:24:59Z")

</div>

![image](https://d1wl4jav5dp96l.cloudfront.net/original/2X/f/f1095554a0bf166f0316f0e8ef918723fce4419c.png)

![image](https://d1wl4jav5dp96l.cloudfront.net/original/2X/9/9d5bed69546454a6874c98ec34f2966dbd5958d0.png)

The data in the main table loads fine. it just the filtes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ErikG](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/erikg/32/14524_2.png) [@ErikG](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ErikG)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:28am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/4 "2023-10-18T09:28:10Z")

</div>

can you try to publish with a specific element instead of “all” on the filter?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ali\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Ali\_B](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Ali_B)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:33am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/5 "2023-10-18T09:33:09Z")

</div>

it works for a while, then users start seeing the same errors. When I first published the dashboard, it worked fine even without preselected values. then after a day or so it started showing errors

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ErikG](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/erikg/32/14524_2.png) [@ErikG](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ErikG)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:35am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/6 "2023-10-18T09:35:21Z")

</div>

Is you dataset growing or was changed in the meantime?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ali\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Ali\_B](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Ali_B)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:38am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/7 "2023-10-18T09:38:14Z")

</div>

The dataset is definitely growing, it is also being worked on although those filter fields are the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ErikG](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/erikg/32/14524_2.png) [@ErikG](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ErikG)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 9:55am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/8 "2023-10-18T09:55:08Z")

</div>

Because it seems there are to many data or the query is not performing well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ali\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Ali\_B](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Ali_B)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 10:08am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/9 "2023-10-18T10:08:10Z")

</div>

The dataset is on SPICE though. I’m not sure what the “query performance” means when your data is loaded in memory on SPICE

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ErikG](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/erikg/32/14524_2.png) [@ErikG](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/ErikG)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 10:20am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/10 "2023-10-18T10:20:04Z")

</div>

Ok. In case of SPICE its not relevant.

Are the filter cascading or standalone? I would try to check if i can downsize the elements in a filter and see if it will work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ali\_B](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e19b73/32.png) [@Ali\_B](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/Ali_B)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2023, 10:22am UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/11 "2023-10-18T10:22:34Z")

</div>

@ErikG By cascading do you mean the “only show relevant values” option on filters? then they are standalone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bergqdou](https://d2orw1595917va.cloudfront.net/user_avatar/community.amazonquick.com/bergqdou/32/4265_2.png) [@bergqdou](https://community.amazonquick.com/u/bergqdou)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2023, 10:49pm UTC](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/dashboard-opens-with-data-but-filters-show-error-request-took-too-long-try-again-later/20131/12 "2023-10-24T22:49:07Z")

</div>

Hi @Ali_B  
Some things to check:

1. How many distinct values are in the fields? Is it a large number that’s causing the performance issue? Also how many rows are in the SPICE dataset.

I believe there are a few options to solve this.

1. As @ErikG mentioned ‘only show relevant values’ will cut down the number of values returned in the filter list.

2. Change the control to ‘Dropdown - multiselect’ so it’s not preloading every value in the dropdown.

3. Create a dataset specifically for the filters/controls that only contains a unique list of values. Outlined here: [Improve Filter performance for Direct Query Dashboards: 2023 Amazon QuickSight Learning Series](https://community.amazonquick.com/t/improve-filter-performance-for-direct-query-dashboards-2023-amazon-quicksight-learning-series/14391)
